General Dentist & Sleep Medicine Specialist · Carolina Center for Cosmetic and Restorative Dentistry
Medical University of South Carolina · Academy of General Dentistry · Kois Center for Advanced Dental Studies · American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry · American Association of Dental Sleep Medicine · Pierre Fauchard Academy
Read full bio
Dr. Jeff Horowitz, a native of Old Bridge, New Jersey, completed his undergraduate studies at the University of Pittsburgh and earned his DMD degree from the Medical University of South Carolina. Upon graduation he completed a general practice residency at the Mountainside Hospital in Montclair, NJ.
In 1992, Dr. Horowitz founded the Carolina Center for Cosmetic and Restorative Dentistry, a multi-disciplinary group practice in the Conway/Myrtle Beach, SC area. His main interests include cosmetic smile rehabilitation, complex restorative cases, treatment of sleep disordered breathing, orthodontics and TMJ disorders.
Dr. Horowitz has earned fellowship from the Academy of General Dentistry where he is actively involved as a past-president and delegate for South Carolina. He also serves as a mentor at the prestigious Kois Center for Advanced Dental Studies, a key opinion leader/lecturer for the Catapult Group, and an instructor for Sleep Group Solutions. His affiliations include the Pierre Fauchard Academy, the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, the American Orthodontic Society, the American Dental Association, the American Association of Dental Sleep Medicine, the Carolina Sleep Society, American Equilibration Society, and the American Academy of Craniofacial Pain.
Are you struggling with the weeks-long delays between diagnosis and treatment delivery for TMJ appliances and sleep devices? What if you could go from initial scan to finished appliance in under 24 hours?
Join Dr. Jeffrey Horowitz, a seasoned general dentist with over 30 years of experience and founder of the Carolina Center for Cosmetic and Restorative Dentistry and Advanced Sleep and TMJ Centers. Dr. Horowitz holds a DMD from the Medical University of South Carolina, completed a general practice residency at Mountainside Hospital, and is a Fellow of the Academy of General Dentistry where he served as past-president. He is also a mentor at the Kois Center for Advanced Dental Studies, key opinion leader for the Catapult Group, and instructor for Sleep Group Solutions, with affiliations including the Pierre Fauchard Academy, American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, American Association of Dental Sleep Medicine, and American Academy of Craniofacial Pain.
This episode explores how 3D printing technology is revolutionizing functional dentistry by eliminating the traditional workflow delays that have plagued TMJ and sleep appliance fabrication. Dr. Horowitz shares his journey from closed-system printers to open-system solutions, explaining why material flexibility is crucial for optimal patient outcomes and practice efficiency.
Episode Highlights:
Open-system 3D printers provide material flexibility that closed systems cannot match, allowing clinicians to select the optimal resin for each specific appliance rather than being locked into proprietary materials that may be cloudy or lack durability. This approach prioritizes clinical outcomes over manufacturer constraints.
The three essential digital technologies for modern dental practices are cone beam imaging for accurate diagnosis, intraoral scanning for precise data capture and patient communication, and 3D printing for rapid appliance fabrication. These three technologies work synergistically to compress traditional multi-week workflows into same-day or next-day treatment delivery.
TMJ and sleep appliance workflows can be compressed from traditional 3-4 week timelines to 24-hour delivery by combining CBCT imaging, intraoral scanning, digital design, and in-office 3D printing. This eliminates the need for alginate impressions, physical models, and multiple patient appointments while reducing pharmaceutical intervention during waiting periods.
Post-processing for 3D printed appliances typically requires 30 minutes of work after printing, including polymerization steps that can be efficiently managed by trained support staff. Multiple appliances can be printed simultaneously to maximize efficiency without significantly increasing print time.
3D printing offers superior return on investment compared to milling systems because it can fabricate splints, surgical guides, temporaries, dentures, denture bases, and custom trays rather than being limited primarily to crown fabrication. With entry costs under $10,000 versus $20,000-$30,000 for milling systems, the versatility and affordability make 3D printing accessible to more practices.
Perfect for: General dentists considering digital workflow integration, specialists treating TMJ disorders and sleep apnea, and practice owners evaluating technology investments for improved efficiency and patient care.
Discover how 3D printing can transform your practice workflow and eliminate the frustrating delays that compromise patient satisfaction in functional dentistry.
Transcript
Read Full Transcript
This transcript was automatically generated and may contain errors or inaccuracies. It is provided for reference and accessibility purposes and may not represent the exact words spoken.
I had bought a closed system printer before because, you know, the sales pitch, you could do
everything with this, but very disenchanted with the materials. They were either cloudy,
they didn't hold up well, they just weren't satisfying my needs. I'm like, well, what good does
this do if I'm locked into the materials that I have to use? Welcome to the Phil Klein Dental
Podcast. We're all hearing about 3D printing, not only in dentistry, but everywhere. I recently saw
an ad for a company that actually 3D prints single-family homes. Essentially, this technology
continues to evolve and has infinite possibilities. But for this episode, we'll be focusing on how
3D printing can be an invaluable tool to help us fabricate the appliances we need for our patients.
We'll be talking about the machine itself, as well as the materials that go into them. So if you're
thinking about incorporating 3D printing into your practice, stay tuned for a very interesting
episode. Our guest is Dr. Jeffrey Horowitz. a seasoned clinician and educator who is passionate
about dentists seeing themselves as oral and facial health care physicians rather than tooth
mechanics. By embracing digital technologies, Dr. Horowitz has improved the quality of care for his
patients while increasing efficiency and reducing the costs to provide these much-needed services.
He believes that within 10 years, almost every GP will have a CBCT, an intraoral scanner,
and 3D printer in their office or within walking distance from their office. Dr.
Horowitz, thanks for joining us on our show. Phil, it is great to hear and see you again. Yeah,
it's been a long time. We saw each other in Scottsdale, Arizona for a program in the past with some
key opinion leaders, which was a great program. I think it was at the Spears Center, and we
actually did a live podcast from there, but it was great. Yeah, great seeing you there with all the
other KOLs, and I'm glad we get a chance to kind of regroup a little bit here on this podcast.
So tell us to begin about your dental practices. Now, we're going to be focusing on 3D printing,
but I just want to give the audience a background about your dental practices and tell us why you
felt the need to incorporate 3D printing into your workflow. Yeah, no, I think that's a great
question. So I started out with a restorative practice, did a lot of... orthodontics did a lot of
tmj work in my restorative practice in conway but really began to focus my practice more into
functional dentistry into all the things that make dentistry fail not addressing the bite not
addressing a tmj problem not addressing sleep apnea problems and so as i began that real focused
learning track. I ended up developing another practice called advanced sleep and TMJ centers,
where I only focused on that, opened up a satellite for that,
which then ended up growing into another restorative practice, totally going the wrong way at my
age, just ramping up. But where my primary interest is in functional dentistry and the problems of
the past with traditional functional dentistry is there's just this huge lag time where you
couldn't really do anything for patients right away. You couldn't make them a good quick splint.
You know, you had to get to mounted models on an articulator. You had to get to, okay,
now I've got the mounted models. Now I've got. to first design what i'm going to make for them
what's the diagnosis and then you have to first get it to a lab and then there's that two to three
week lag time there so there's always been a need for for more immediate treatment and what i
believe is now more accurate treatment so now i've got these separate practices and i have a lot of
need for for immediate and and high quality treatment for my patients.
Now, did your desire to get into this kind of dentistry come first? And then when the digital
aspect became available for the efficiency that you're talking about to expedite these appliances
to treat these patients, then you said, okay, I'm going in on this. Now I've got what I need.
Or did the digital technology with maybe some interest in, for instance,
airway services then drive you to do this? No, it was the prior.
It was that I've always had an interest in this type of work.
I've always been into technology. So, you know, I was an early adopter of CEREC and 3D printing
technologies. And I loved what that was able to afford, especially once I saw that the quality was
not going to suffer, but that. In fact, we could make the quality improved with more immediate
results, less time for patients to have micro leakage, no temporary, less emergency visits.
And so this was really exactly what you had mentioned, where before it was so painstaking to take a
patient from diagnosis to therapeutics. The time lag was horrible,
and I felt so bad for these patients. And what do you do when you have that lag time? You end up
using pharmaceuticals to try to mask the problem that really you want to address as quickly as
possible. Yeah, and I think what you're addressing, especially with airway issues, is just so
critically important in dentistry. And I think we're moving more towards that,
where more dental clinicians are getting into airway services. They're becoming airway-centric,
they call themselves, which is very, very important considering the percentage of people that have
maybe not full-blown obstructive sleep apnea, but they have...
issues that could obviously preclude successful restorative dentistry long-term when you are
breathing through your mouth at night. Most of our audience understands why. So you're in this
infinite loop of dental restorative care with the lifespan of a crown being much shorter than it
otherwise would be if you weren't breathing through your mouth, among other issues that,
of course, mouth breathers and snores. have problems with their relationships and everything else.
But it's becoming much more popular than in the past, this kind of focusing on error-centric and
the kind of things you're talking about. And 3D printing is certainly coming to save us from the
aggravation, like you said, the painstaking aggravation that all this entails, doing it the old
-fashioned way. Obviously, you've been in the world of digital workflow, as you said, for a while.
But if you could, in your memory, go back to the earlier days, Dr. Horowitz, tell us how difficult
it was, if it was difficult, to move from traditional workflow, analog workflow, to digital
scanning, and then more specifically, 3D printing. Great point, first of all,
about sleep apnea, because one third of the patients going through any dental practice are going to
have the signs or symptoms of sleep apnea. And we know,
as you said, gastroesophageal reflux. We know clenching,
grinding. We know narrow arches, malocclusions. There's just so many things that come with that.
Dentists really all need to at least have a basic understanding of this topic,
even if they decide that they're not going to treat it. But going back to your question of the
typical workflow. Let's take it from a TMJ patient standpoint. So the first part of that was always
a detailed examination. We didn't have CBCT in the past.
We actually used something called an axiotome, where rather than the computer making the images in
three dimensions, we actually moved the patient instead of the computer making the slices. We
actually moved the patient to make the slices. So just getting the x-rays was one thing.
But now we would also have to take digital images of the teeth because the occlusion tells us so
much about what's going on. If it's a foundationally based problem,
if it's an occlusal muscle driven problem. And so what did that involve?
That involved. alginate impressions or maybe a pvs substitute more recently than having somebody
pour that up doing some kind of a face bow transfer um getting the case mounted and then being able
to bring the patient back to review that diagnosis and try to show them on this you know,
articulator, not the easiest thing in the world. So now we move to scanning technologies where we
can show them the signs of bruxism. We can show them, you know, the fractured teeth.
We're getting the images of the teeth as well. So it's your intraoral photography. It's your
models. And now we have the ability to mount that on a virtual articulator right there on the
screen. And so we can begin to really get to diagnosis faster, which then allows us to get to
treatment. So where before it was one appointment to capture data,
one appointment to bring them back and discuss. diagnosis, then potentially a new set of
impressions and bites to go to whatever therapeutic modality that we want to implement,
and then bringing them back three weeks later. Now at that first visit,
we scan them. We have our images. We have our CBCT. I can couple those things together.
If the patient says yes that day, I don't need another scan. I don't need to report any models.
I might just take a different bite registration, something to hold them in the place where I want,
scan them, and then make them something that they can have in their hands the following morning.
And there are some things that I still 3D print. There are some dicetyl resin.
appliances that I make that still need to be 3D, excuse me, not printed.
They need to be milled actually. And it's just the type of milling machine you need for a full arch
mill like that is just beyond what I can have in the office. But most of the solutions are really
printable. Right here in my office. And I don't even do that. I mean, I walk out of the room and
Cindy has something for me if it's the morning, potentially by the end of the day, or if it's the
evening by the next morning. And even if I have to have a lab processed therapeutic model,
then I still have something to give them right away. So the patient communication aspect of this is
a game changer compared to the past, right? Just getting case acceptance,
just getting them through case acceptance so that they can visualize and understand what your plan
is. Well, you get it, Phil. I mean, you've been in the profession for a long time and patients get
burnt out. It's like I'm on my fifth visit. Nothing has happened. Right. Right. So,
you know, whatever we're going to do, whether it be a neuromuscular appliance like a deprogrammer,
we can 3D print that. right away, whether it's just,
you know, going to a full arch splint situation for neuromuscular or for TMJ internal derangement
discrepancy. Again, I can take this, even if I'm not the one designing it,
I can still get it done typically within 24 hours. You know, there are three specific steps that
everyone has to understand. There's data capture. Then there's design, and then there's print.
And so most dentists don't want to spend their time in the world of design.
Now, I've become an ExoCAD user just because it's hard to,
when you want things as specific as I do, it's hard to do that with the laboratory. But there are
times where I don't have the time to design a splint, and my lab knows what I like.
and i can send it over to them and within a couple of hours they've got an exocad designed for me
to review and then boom it goes straight to my printer from there and how much work do you have to
do once it's printed how much like what we call in the editing business post-production post
-production right so for cine there there's typically a polymerization Cindy is my TMJ assistant
and does all of our 3D printing. I'd love to tell you that I know all the numbers and settings and
all that. That's a podcast for you and Cindy, actually. I understand the science and I understand
the basic principles, but most of the post-production and the nuances of printing,
she is just amazing at. But typically... know 30 minutes um once it's out and you know depending on
what it is you're printing and depending on how many so sometimes we'll have three or four splints
that are being printed at one time and of course the print time is going to be a little bit longer
for that um sometimes we're we're printing one and you know within you know within a couple of
hours we have our finished product now do you think uh dentists that are using 3d printing are
getting their staff trained under the design work end of it so the dentist doesn't have to get
involved with that. And eventually the staff becomes very, very competent at designing most of
these appliances. Or do you think, is that something that's becoming more common?
So I have not done that. The thing is, so when it comes to like 3D milling,
I did have my staff very involved in that. When it comes to 3D printing,
Design can be a little bit more nuanced. There's a lot to it.
And so typically I'm either designing it or the lab technician and a very specific lab technician
that I've worked with, he will design it because he already knows all of the idiosyncrasies that I
want fulfilled in whatever appliance it is that I make. But with that said,
once that design is done, that design goes right to Cindy. She puts it in the nesting software and
she handles everything from nesting the design that was done to printing it to the post-production
work and polymerization. So let me ask you this, Dr. Horowitz. What are some of the bigger
challenges that our audience should be aware of and possibly anticipate? when it comes to actually
making that transition from analog dentistry to digital. And usually the process is they get a
scanner. The next move is to get a printer. And those are the first two basic things.
And, you know, tell us that journey. Like, what are they? looking at as far as kind of pain points
in the early stages of that transition. You know, so one of the biggest disconnects that I have
seen has been in getting dentists to understand everyone was out there talking about digital.
Oh, look what I can do. I can take a patient from A to Z and I can do that in,
you know, less than 12 hours like I'm talking about now. But no one,
there was very little education about how you go from data capture to design.
to nesting, to printing or milling. And I've got to tip my hat to VOCO for this because...
Voco is a company that I've worked with because of their dental materials for a long time,
the excellence in dental materials. And they actually offered me the opportunity because I was
going down this path of 3D printing and I didn't want to get pigeonholed into having to use one
specific printer that only allowed. for certain materials,
in other words, a closed system. So VOCO offered me this opportunity to come out to Kuxhaven,
Germany, where their plant is, and I got a full guided tour filled.
blown away blown away at the r d and i mean literally you could eat off the floor and by the way i
did eat off their floor because yeah they did serve me a bratwurst that fell on the ground i'm like
this place is clean enough right i'm eating it yeah i'm not here that often to let this thing go in
the garbage so it's actually very interesting though for a clinician who's in the operatory to have
the opportunity to go to germany in this case for voco And I am familiar with Voco and they have a
phenomenal R&D department. But to actually see what goes on there, the amount of work and then
they it's just amazing. It's really amazing. And you had that opportunity. So what did you get out
of that trip? How did that help you clinically? Oh, this this actually solidified my 3D printing
journey because. i had bought a closed system printer before because you know the sales pitch you
could do everything with this but very disenchanted with the materials and you know they were
either cloudy they didn't hold up well they just weren't satisfying my needs i'm like well what
good does this do if i'm locked into the materials that i have to use And so my goal for going out
there was to really press the scientists who know way more than I do about the nuances of design
printing and certainly about materials was to say,
OK, let's take this from the standpoint of what are the ideal materials for each given situation?
And what do you have? And then. with those materials, what options do I have to print those?
And so this is what blew me away was, and I wasn't even really familiar with a lot of VOCO's 3D
printing materials, but they literally have a printing material for just about every single option.
And here's the other thing is their scientists have figured out a way to not have a lot of
sediment. in these printing liquids i don't know how they do it because in almost every printing
system they tell first thing you have to do you have to shake the bottle up right and and because
there's going to be a lot of sediment and god forbid if you don't then you have inclusions in your
appliances and the strength is gone um So, you know, that was the first thing was going,
okay, Voco's got some pretty amazing 3D printing materials,
but then came out a question, can I use this in my closed printer system? And the answer was no,
because company X just wants to sell company X's.
That's a typical business move. I mean, that's nothing new. But it's not really best for the
patient, not really best for the practitioner. So I took it from that standpoint.
And then I said, OK, they said, you can use our materials in any open printing system.
And I said, all right, well, you know, what would you recommend then? You know, you are working on
these. What are the machines that you have sitting in your laboratories? Because I'm listening to
you. You know, you're the guy with the fancy hat and the mask on and and with the calculators and
everything. And and so the thing that came across from that was Voco had actually developed their
own 3D printing system, but was always. uh intent on keeping that an open system because they
didn't want to be seen as that company you have to use our materials we want you to use our
materials because of how great they are not because we're making you use them and so they offer an
option for their uh you know people who are just very devout to to voco um they have a a machine
called the soul flex which is a very nice printer But the other printer that kept coming up was a
SIGA, which is not a very well-known name in dental offices, but almost every dental laboratory
has one of them in. Where's that made?
Where is a SIGA made? Australia, I believe. I believe it's made in Australia.
But we do have an SIGA distributor here in America.
And so I said, okay, good enough for the scientists. good enough for me, actually approached Asiga
and told them that I was really off on this mission to kind of simplify the whole 3D imaging to
diagnosis to 3D printed solutions. And I would love to get one of their machines in to sample and
then purchase if it worked out well, because I really want to preach about open systems and using
the highest quality materials. You did buy that machine and it's worked out really well.
I ended up buying the Asiga and I, you know, listen, I still have my old closed system,
which we'll use for some simpler modalities. But when it comes to the high strength that I need for
a deprogrammer, for a TMJ splint, or for a temporary airway device,
I'm going to go with these V-print materials, which are made by VOCO.
And again, I don't want this to sound like a commercial. I'm just telling you my experience with
the VOCO materials. And there are other good materials out there. You don't have to use it. My
suggestion and my message to everyone is... Find the best materials for the job and then make sure
that they can be used in whatever system you have. Don't get locked in by one particular
manufacturer to say you've got to use these materials. Right. But in order to know that the
material is what you want, you have to use it, which is much different than doing a direct
restorative where you don't need a printer. So in this case, you actually should start with an open
type of system for your printing. Just for that reason is a really cool thing,
too. And this is, you know, you could say kind of I had a little honeymoon with them because of
everything that they offered, because, you know, again, my mission is not to go out there and be a
spokesperson for any one company. is to make dentistry simpler for patients and more effective,
you know, simpler for dentists and more effective for my patients.
And so, but part of that honeymoon was like, okay, you want us to print you something?
We'll print it. They actually have it on their website, Phil, where you can go on and they will
print you from any of their materials so you can feel and hold it. All you have to do is,
you know, send them the information. The other thing that they've done too,
which, you know, again, this is kind of going above and beyond, is they've put an ROI calculator on
their site as well to show dentists, look, even if you don't want to get into TMJ or sleep like I
do, If you're just finding the bruxism and doing occlusal splints and guards for kids and things
like that, you can really make 3D printing pay in absolutely zero time.
But the open system is just paramount. So for a second, Dr.
Horowitz, let's pivot to the general practice who is not invested in digital dentistry at this
time. They're primarily analog. They may use a lab that has digital tools, of course,
but in their office themselves, they're pretty much analog. Talk about the three main digital tools
that you would recommend for a GP to invest in and integrate into their workflow and prioritize
them, not only for their practical use, but also for their return on investment.
technology items that we can have in a dental practice one is cone beam imaging two was having a
good quality scanner um the cost savings there on everything you can do with that the roi on that
is right there and then three is a printer now notice i didn't say milling even though i said i was
an early and i did get an roi on that and i still do to this day but if you think about what a mill
machine does is it pretty much does one thing it makes crowns for us right right and outside of
that and there still has to be a design process in the office if you want to get it to the patient
that same day so there was really even though there is an roi with with milling and and i certainly
found it I don't think investing $20,000 or $30,000 in that for someone who may be far along in
the game makes much sense. With 3D printers coming on the market at most under $10,000,
and think about what you can do with these you can make splints you can make surgical guides you
can make temporaries you can make dentures denture bases custom trays literally anything and you
know the the problem with same day dentistry with milling was that do we want dentists using their
most valuable commodity which is time to be in their designing It's great if you can get an
assistant to learn that or you can train them to do that. But there was definitely a back and
forth, you know, kind of a dance that you had to learn to do that. In this case,
with 3D printing, because of all of these different procedures, and we're not saying it has to be
done within the hour. We're just saying... know in a more condensed amount of time and at a much
much much lower price point and and if we can do that and not have to be forced into doing our own
design listen i'm just doing that because i'm a nerd and and i'm a control freak but you don't have
to do that yeah and i think that design that design component scares some dentists away i think
they're a little yeah Yeah, we went to school not to be CAD designers.
We went to school to do dentistry. Although the new crop of dentists in 10 years from now,
Dr. Horowitz, you may not be able to say that. They could be just designers.
But yeah, finding that relationship, and there are more and more labs out there now that are
saying, listen, we're great. We don't have to make your appliance. We don't let us do the design
for you. you know, 25, 30 bucks, I'll have a design back to you in an hour.
You can give me feedback. And I still do that sometimes when I don't have the time. My time is the
most important thing. So I'm not going to take patient time away to go design a case that might
take me an hour. I'm going to send that one away if I need it tomorrow or if I have the weekend,
maybe I will do the design. I'm glad you mentioned CBCT as an inodontist myself. But I think CBCT,
as much as it costs, I think it is the number one technology also. I agree with you 100%.
In fact, I'm doing some podcasts coming up with Bruno Azevedo, Dr.
Azevedo. I don't know if you know him. He's a board certified radiologist. He just finished his
endo program in Philly down the road from where I went to endo. He's doing some podcasts with me
about the use of... of CBCT for the general practitioner, even if you don't do implants. So for you
to say, well, I don't do implants. I don't need a CBCT. It's $80,000. But that machine, man,
that machine is a game changer for GPs. You know, the more I see the different types of things that
that does and how that sets the treatment plan correctly is just mind boggling.
If you took CBCT away from me, I would not want to practice. You're an amazing guy,
Dr. Horowitz, because you embrace this stuff, you know, full force ahead.
You weren't afraid of it. You have more practices than I can count on one hand. And you're opening
new ones and you're using a lot of technology to make this all grow. Do you wish you were 30 years
old again? Yeah. And for a lot of reasons. OK,
let's focus on it. Let's focus on the dental reason. Yeah. Yeah. It's a dental podcast. It's rated
GP. Yeah. OK. No pun intended. Yeah, I do. I think this is the single most exciting time in my
career. And I say that because what and I also believe that those three technologies.
The ones we mentioned, CBCT, scanning and printing, I believe will be in 95% of all practices by
the end of this decade. And they should be. And they should be. When I lecture,
I don't want to see any dental practice that does not have at least access within walking distance
of a CBCT machine because you just need it for diagnosis. Scanning technology allows us to not only
get impressions that are more accurate, but get impressions that we can keep forever.
in the cloud or or just to always have them and to be able to compare and to be able to diagnose
from our from our desk without having to run to a lab and then finally 3d printing is the answer
that that milling wasn't so as i said milling was for a very specific group of dentists and i loved
it i love being able to offer a one to one hour and 15 minute crown that I could rest behind and
feel great about. Again, I put some control in my hands, which, you know,
said control-free. But 3D printing, the amount...
procedures that can take the bottom line of a dental practice and revolutionize it while also doing
a positive service for the patient for under $10,000. I just don't see it.
And the printers are getting cheaper. So I really believe that by the end of the decade,
it's going to be the real outlier that doesn't have these 3D printing solutions in their practice.
They just need to replace their fax machine with a 3D printer. That's all. Then they'll be right up
to speed. All right. Well, listen, Dr. Horowitz, you've been amazing as usual. I miss you now more
because we had this great discussion back in Scottsdale, I don't know how many years ago. We were
sitting there having hors d'oeuvres at the bar with a bunch of other KOLs that were rambling
around, but it was a great time and it reminds me that... so nice to speak to someone who really
appreciates the technology of dentistry, knows how to apply it, knows how to teach it. And my last
question is, where do you teach right now? Yeah, interesting. So I'm working with Dr. Brian Shaw,
TMJ surgeon down in St. Pete. He purchased the Piper Clinic.
I actually had learned under Dr. Piper. So we're doing some courses together. As you know,
I'm part of a group called Dentists in the Know, and we do hosting and teaching for the American
Independent Dental Alliance, which is a group of distributorships,
dental companies that have helped dentists come together for...
reasonably priced, solid education. And that's where my efforts are primarily,
but little secret in our new building that we are moving into,
we do have a teaching center. So I'm hoping not to be on as many airplanes coming up.
Power to you. You've got a very active, busy life in dentistry, and it's keeping you young, and
it's keeping you on top of things, which is just amazing. Thanks so much, Dr. Horowitz, for your
time. Great discussion, great podcast, and hope to have you back again soon. Thanks so much, Phil.
Always a pleasure to see you.
Clinical Keywords
3D printingdental 3D printerTMJ appliancessleep apnea devicesdigital workflowCBCT imagingintraoral scanningopen system printerclosed system printerVOCO V-print materialsAsiga printerocclusal splintsneuromuscular appliancesdigital dentistryJeff HorowitzJeffrey HorowitzDr. Phil Kleindental podcastdental educationfunctional dentistrysame-day dentistrydental materialsExoCADpost-processingpolymerizationsurgical guidescustom traysdenture basescone beam CTdental technologyROI calculator