Dr. Griggs conducted his undergraduate and graduate studies at the University of Florida in materials science & engineering under Dr. Ken Anusavice and Dr. Jack Mecholsky. He received his PhD from the University of Florida in 1998. He joined the faculty at Baylor College of Dentistry (Texas A&M) that same year as an Assistant Professor. During his appointment at Baylor, Dr. Griggs worked for and collaborated with Dr. Toru Okabe as he progressed to the rank of Professor and served as Graduate Program Director and Vice-Chair of the Department of Biomaterials Science. Dr. Griggs arrived at University of Mississippi Medical Center (UMMC) in 2007 to serve as Chair of the Department of Biomedical Materials Science because the founding department chair, Dr. Lyle Zardiackas, was retiring. He began serving as Asssociate Dean for Research in 2008. He is the Convener for the ISO workgroup on dental ceramics. He is a Fellow and former President of the Academy of Dental Materials. He serves on the editorial boards for Dental Materials, Journal of Dental Research, and JADA Foundational Science. He was selected as teacher-of-the-year of his university, and he has received the highest research award at UMMC, the platinum medallion for research excellence. He has served as Principal Investigator of 5 NIH R01 grants and authored over 80 peer-reviewed articles, 6 book chapters, and 2 patents.
Dental podcast: Welcome to DentalTalk. I'm Dr. Phil Klein. Today we'll be discussing ways to insure our clinical success by using dental materials that give us the best results. In order to do this we really need to have some understanding of what ISO is and how their recommendations affect how our products are tested and the claims made by the manufacturers. We should understand the basics behind flexural strength v. fracture toughness, testing methodology and utilizing data to make the right material selection for our restorative cases. To help make this all relevant to the dental clinician, I am pleased to welcome our guest, Dr. Jason A. Griggs.
Transcript
Read Full Transcript
This transcript was automatically generated and may contain errors or inaccuracies. It is provided for reference and accessibility purposes and may not represent the exact words spoken.
You're listening to The Dr. Phil Klein Dental Podcast from Viva Learning.com.
Welcome to the show. I'm Dr. Phil Klein. Today we'll be discussing ways to ensure our clinical
success by using dental materials that give us the best results. In order to do this,
we really need to have some understanding of what ISO is and how their recommendations affect how
our products are tested and the claims made by the manufacturers. we should understand the basics
behind flexural strength versus fracture toughness, testing methodology, and utilizing data to make
the right material selection for our restorative cases. To help us make this all relevant to the
dental clinician, I'm pleased to welcome our guest, Dr. Jason A. Griggs. Dr. Griggs is the global
head of ISO, the International Organization for Standardization, workgroup on dental ceramics.
He has served as principal investigator of various grants and authored over 80 peer-reviewed
articles, six book chapters, and two patents. He is currently associate dean at the University of
Mississippi School of Dentistry. Dr. Griggs, it's a pleasure to have you on Dental Talk. Phil, it's
a pleasure to be here. Tell us what ISO means and stands for, and how is it relevant to the dental
manufacturer and ultimately, of course, the dental clinician? The ISO is an international
organization for standardization and it's a group of product manufacturers and academic scientists
and even end users. Some dentists are members of the group and what they try to do is make sure
that all the products we use in our modern life are safe and reliable and that the terms that we
use to describe the performance of those products are consistent in the same from one lab to
another and from one manufacturer to another. For example, one thing that would be important for
them that the ISO would tell them what types of information about the product need to be included
in the instruction card that goes in the box and is shipped to the dentist. And in addition,
the ISO would tell the manufacturer how to conduct the test methods to measure the information the
product performance that they put on that card and would give them suggested minimum limits for
important material properties like strength or fracture toughness and would also tell them maximum
permissible limits of undesirable things like radioactivity uh cytotoxicity how much uh the dental
product may leach out into the patient's saliva uh to set maximum safe limits for those things if
i'm a manufacturer and i'm making a dental ceramic i pretty much need to be totally on board with
iso right i need to work with them or be involved with them You would need to follow the ISO
standards, and the regulations would vary from one country to the next,
but I think most countries would have a regulation requiring the manufacturer to follow ISO
standards. Right. So even if I make it in the United States, I'm only asking this question because
I want to make sure our audience understands the importance of ISO, that it's important for them as
clinicians to purchase products that have rigorous testing. And let's get into testing. So what are
some of the proper testing protocols regarding dental ceramics that a dental clinician should
understand? And also answer the question, why should they be concerned with that? Probably one of
the most important tests, important ceramic material properties is strength.
of the material because ceramics have a problem that they are more brittle than other classes of
materials and their strength or lifetime is a little bit more variable than other classes of
materials. So when we think of ceramics strength is one of the most important properties and it
would be important to measure that strength using a consistent test method.
For example, you would need to shape and polish strength test specimen from the dental ceramic.
And if you choose to polish and polish and provide an ultra fine finish on the surface,
you can make the strength of that test specimen go higher and higher, the finer you polish it. So
there's a standard test method that tells what fineness of abrasive media should be used to grind
the specimen flat, how much material should be removed from the surface,
and what fineness of surface polish should go through. The standard tells what rate of speed to
bend the specimen when breaking it because the faster you bend the specimen, the higher strength
you're going to measure. It prevents accidental mistakes in testing, and the standard also prevents
manipulation of the test method to make the product appear stronger than it actually is.
Right. So it keeps everybody on an even playing field when they make their claims about their
physical properties of the material. How is that enforced, though? Does ISO have any influence on
enforcing or role in enforcing any of this? when these manufacturers do these tests, or are these
just recommendations, which are very important, of course? Well, these are recommendations, and
then it would be up to individual governments to enforce whether or not to follow the
recommendations if you're selling a product in their market. I see. Okay, so it's an international
kind of a consensus of experts in each one of these fields. You're one of the experts in ceramics,
for dental ceramics. That's correct. I've been doing dental ceramics research for about 30 years
now, and I'm the convener or the head of the ISO work group on dental ceramics.
That's impressive. We're really talking to someone who knows just about everything there is to know
about dental ceramics from the standpoint of engineering. How challenging is it to meet all of
these protocols for the manufacturer, and is there a governing body that checks, and I asked you
that before, manufacturers for these standards? It's a complicated structure because there's so
many different type of dental products and products we use in our everyday lives.
So the ISO has a TC 106 or Technical Committee 106 is in charge of all aspects of dental products.
And you can tell from the name of that technical committee that there's a lot of other areas other
than dentistry that the ISO is regulating. But within the Committee 106,
we have hundreds of scientists working together to make sure that the standards are good and
consistent. And so we have to break that down. And there are a lot of subcommittees under the
Dental Committee. And subcommittee two pertains to all aspects of prosthodontic materials.
And even within prosthodontic materials, there's a wide variety of tests and standards.
And so we have a lot of work groups under subcommittee two. And work group number one is for dental
ceramics. We handle the standard ISO 6872,
which covers testing. fracture toughness, strength, solubility,
radioactivity, all those aspects of ceramics for dental prostheses.
And we used to publish and edit a standard 9693 on metal ceramic materials intended for use in PFM,
crowns and bridges, porcelain fused to metal. And we also have standards telling how laboratory
furnaces should be calibrated under our work group. When these companies that manufacture these
products, or the dentists buy, They reach out to ISO. They look at these standards.
They either purchase the information, the research, whatever the PDF is, and then they make sure
that they're compliant to the best of their ability to this standardization, which is testing their
materials and which will ultimately affect the claims they make on the packaging and their
advertising. Is that right? That's correct. And in addition, many of the manufacturers send
representatives, some of their employees, to serve on the ISO Dental Committee,
and they help the academic scientists with understanding the way that the materials are changing
and developing new test methods for new materials that are coming to the market. So we work
together on that. Yeah. So what should a dentist look for when they're purchasing a product, a
ceramic dental material, that would give them the confidence that it's the gold standard? And give
us an example of a gold standard in ceramic dental materials. There are a lot of aspects depending
on what location the ceramic crown or bridge is going to be placed in the mouth.
And so obviously color hue, translucency, properties like that are important.
But as I mentioned earlier, the Achilles heel of ceramics is that they have less predictable
strength and lifetime compared to other materials. So for confidence, the dentist definitely wants
to take a look at the strength or the fracture toughness of the... the ceramic material.
As far as a material with, we could call a gold standard, I would go for one with a long track
record of proven reliability and one that also is fairly, you know, translucent for the aesthetics
as well. If I needed to have a crown or bridge placed in the anterior of my mouth personally,
I would ask the dentist to use Emax CAD or Emax Press,
the lithium disilicate glass ceramic product. The Emax CAD has been used for 15 years now.
And before it, the same manufacturer was producing IPS Impress 2,
which is very similar in composition and performance. And so there's even more than a 15-year
successful history. I think they have 10 years now of... ongoing clinical trial data showing that
the failure rate is a little bit less than 3% after 10 years.
And so if I had to choose a gold standard, I would hold that material up as a point of comparison
for other dental ceramics. I want to ask you about flexural strength versus fracture toughness.
We always hear this as dentists. We see it in advertisements. We see it in webinars.
some research article that talks about flexural strength. Tell us the difference between flexural
strength and fracture toughness, and why is it important to the clinician? Well, the flexural
strength is the amount of stress that a crown or bridge can take before it fractures.
And I think that's a pretty intuitive concept for a lot of people, and so it's great for that
reason. But the problem... with flexural strength you don't want that to be the only material
property you look at because it's quite variable from one restoration to the next or from one test
specimen to the next and the strength of a particular specimen will depend on the the size or
severity of the flaws that are present like a scratch or a bubble or a place where The crown had to
be adjusted for better fit by grinding it. And the strength also can be changed a lot by
differences in test method. Even within the ISO standard test method,
there could be a variation in how that test is properly performed from one lab to the next.
And both labs can be performing the test within the standard and can get...
different strength values. So the fracture toughness is important for three reasons to dentists.
One is that it's more of a material constant. It's almost constant for a given material independent
of the way that the material was tested. There's less variation in strength. It's also important
because the fracture toughness determines how sensitive the strength is to the presence of flaws.
So for example, a material with a very high fracture toughness would have almost the same strength.
after a scratch was introduced into it as it did before the scratch was introduced.
And then the last reason fracture toughness is important is because we had a study by Dr.
Bob Kelly previously that showed a good correlation between fracture toughness and clinical data,
the actual annual failure rates of prostheses in the clinic. And so if we measure the fracture
toughness of a material, we can use Dr. Kelly's regression model to predict what percent of crowns
made from that material will fail per year. Now, of course, it also has to do with the preparation
design, the laboratory technique, the occlusion. I mean, there's all these other factors involved
as well. But putting everything on an even playing field, it sounds like to me the fracture
toughness is something that's more of a universal. measurement or metric that doctors should pay
attention to because that's less of a variable, as you explained, in the testing technique and how
they actually test it. Whereas the flexural strength, there's variabilities that even happen within
the ISO recommendations and that criteria. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. So if I was a
practicing dentist, I would certainly pay attention to the fracture toughness. I would make sure
the ISO recommendations were followed and are being taken seriously by the manufacturer.
And then, of course, look at the track record because it is difficult sometimes for dentists to
make decisions to use certain materials. But I agree. Emacs has been around a long time. And I
think that's a pretty solid recommendation made by a company that is very, very strong and
stringent with R&D. and working with people like you, Dr. Griggs from the ISO. Thanks very much
for your time. I appreciate it. I think there's been a lot to listen to here and it's a little bit
detailed more than our typical podcast, but I think if people rewind it and listen to it three
times, they'll get it all straightened out in their head. Thanks so much and have a great evening,
Dr. Griggs. Thank you so much for your help. Phil, thank you for having me on.
Keywords
dentaldentistIvoclarCAD/CAM Technology and MaterialsCrown/Bridge/Veneers/Indirect